Regulation and Compliance

The prudential regulation of insurers under Solvency II

By Robin Swain and David Swallow of the Bank of England’s Prudential Policy Directorate.

 

On 1 January 2016 a new regime for the prudential regulation of European insurance companies will be implemented under Solvency II. 'The prudential regulation of insurers under Solvency II' begins by examining the business model of an insurer, gives a condensed history of insurance regulation to date and draws out the key features and benefits of the new legislation.

 

Insurance companies perform a key function in the economy.  If the industry is not sufficiently resilient to financial shocks then both policyholders and the economy could suffer.  There is a need for effective, risk-based regulation and supervision of this important industry - Solvency II marks a substantial move forward in this regard. 

 

Solvency II is the culmination of a 13 year modernisation project to introduce a forward-looking, risk-based capital regime that provides greater incentives for firms to improve their understanding and management of the risks they face – marrying together risk and capital.  However, for the UK, Solvency II should be seen as more of an ‘evolution’ – rather than ‘revolution’. UK insurance firms should be well prepared for these transitions as they already operate to a risk-based capital regime under the remit of ICAS.

 

What is the purpose of Solvency II? At its core, Solvency II aims to secure a consistent and appropriate level of protection for consumers throughout Europe.  The new regime will harmonise an EU framework that has, over time, become increasingly fragmented.

 

Its intent is to create a safer and more resilient insurance industry, reducing the probability of firms failing. However, in addition to these overarching principles, Solvency II introduces several key features, the collective impact of which is to ensure firms identify, quantify and manage risks on a forward-looking basis, in addition to providing greater transparency:

 

  • market-consistent valuation of assets and liabilities;
  • enhanced quality of capital;
  • a forward-looking and risk based approach to capital requirements;
  • improved governance and risk management requirements;
  • a rigorous approach to group supervision; and

•    strengthened market discipline through increased firm disclosures.

 

These features, and the anticipated impact they will have, are explained throughout this informative, explanatory article. To read the full article please click here. 

Regulation and Compliance

Crestbridge in Luxembourg has been approved by the regulator there (CSSF) to act as a manager under the European Venture Capital Funds (EuVECA) regulation. 

Regulation and Compliance

Guernsey says it has extended market access to EU Alternative Investment Fund Managers (AIFMs) and Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs) doing business in Guernsey.

Regulation and Compliance

The International Securities Services Association has adopted a set of Financial Crime Compliance Principles. The aim, it says, is to support the efforts of the global community of securities custodians and intermediaries to address the critical challenges posed by financial crime (he Principles can be downloaded from the ISSA website).

Regulation and Compliance

London Stock Exchange Group (LSEG) has signed heads of terms with Boat Services Ltd to build a MiFID II-compliant trade reporting service. 

 

Regulation and Compliance

UK regulators have approved Societe Generale Securities Services (SGSS) to offer trustee and depositary services in the UK for UCITS and alternative investment funds.

 

Regulation and Compliance

IBM unit mandates CACEIS

Mutuelle du Personnel IBM (IBM’s staff health insurance scheme) has asked CACEIS to meet its requirements for look-through reporting, data enrichment and calculation of the gross market SCR (solvency capital requirement) for portfolios already held under custody in light of the Solvency II reform, in effect from January 1 2016.